Trump and Princess Diana: The Flower Story That Turned Into a Nightmare at Kensington Palace! 😳🌹

 

Donald Trump and Princess Diana: The Story of the Flowers, the Rumors and the Unrequited Attention

For weeks, enormous bouquets of roses and orchids reportedly arrived at Kensington Palace. They were sent from across the Atlantic, addressed to one of the most famous women in the world: Diana, Princess of Wales.

According to British television journalist Selina Scott, the flowers came from Donald Trump, the New York businessman who had become increasingly fascinated by Diana after meeting her at social and charitable events in the 1990s. What began, in Scott's telling, as admiration allegedly developed into a persistent attempt to attract the princess's attention.

Diana, however, was not interested.

Scott later recalled that the princess became uncomfortable with the repeated deliveries and wondered what she should do about them. In one account, Diana allegedly told Scott that Trump "gave her the creeps," while Scott advised her simply to throw the flowers away. These claims have circulated widely in the British and American press for years, but they remain an account attributed to Scott rather than a fully independently documented record of Diana's private reaction.

The story has endured because it brings together two extraordinarily recognizable figures from the 1990s: an American real-estate billionaire whose celebrity was growing rapidly and a British princess whose global fame seemed almost impossible to escape.

Their connection was never a romance. There is no evidence that Diana and Trump dated. Instead, what survives is a strange and often contradictory story of admiration, unwanted attention, flowers, denials and a missed opportunity that Trump himself later described as one of his regrets.

A Meeting in the Spotlight

Donald Trump and Princess Diana moved through some of the same elite social circles during the 1990s. Diana's public life increasingly included charity events, international appearances and encounters with influential figures outside the traditional British establishment.

One of the meetings frequently mentioned in accounts of the pair took place in New York in 1995, at a charity dinner where Diana was being honored for her humanitarian work. Contemporary and later reports describe Trump and his then-wife, Marla Maples, as being among the guests. The event was one of the many occasions when Diana's international celebrity brought her into contact with wealthy businesspeople, entertainers and political figures.

Diana's public image by this point was already enormous. She was no longer simply the young woman who had married the heir to the British throne. She had become an international celebrity in her own right, particularly through her charitable work.

The Royal Family's official biography records that Diana supported more than 100 charities during her years as a member of the royal family and became particularly associated with causes involving homelessness, disability, children and HIV/AIDS. Following her separation from Prince Charles, she continued her humanitarian work while reducing many of her official royal responsibilities.

For someone like Trump, whose business career was closely connected to celebrity, luxury and public image, Diana represented a remarkable figure.

And according to Scott, he noticed her immediately.

The Mar-a-Lago Invitation

Another detail repeated in accounts of the relationship concerns Trump's Florida estate, Mar-a-Lago.

According to reports, Trump offered Diana a complimentary membership to his private club. She reportedly declined.

The gesture fits the social world of the time. Mar-a-Lago was one of Trump's most recognizable properties, and membership was presented as a privilege associated with wealth, exclusivity and celebrity.

For Diana, however, there appears to have been little reason to accept such an offer. She already had access to an extraordinary social network and was constantly surrounded by invitations, events and wealthy acquaintances.

The significance of the invitation became clearer only years later, when journalists began looking back at Trump's apparent interest in her.

Scott's account suggests that Trump was not simply impressed by Diana's fame. She believed he saw the princess as an exceptionally desirable potential partner and, in her words, an "ultimate trophy wife."

That characterization was Scott's interpretation, however, not a documented statement from Trump describing Diana in exactly those terms.

The Flowers Begin

The most famous part of the story allegedly happened after Diana's divorce from Prince Charles.

The couple's separation had been announced in 1992, but their divorce was not finalized until August 28, 1996. The Royal Family's official biography confirms that after the divorce Diana continued to live at Kensington Palace, where her household and office were based.

According to Scott, this was when Trump began sending Diana large quantities of flowers.

The bouquets were reportedly made up of expensive roses and orchids and were delivered to Kensington Palace from the United States. Scott later described what she called a "floral bombardment."

The imagery is almost cinematic: the gates of Kensington Palace, an endless stream of flower deliveries, and a princess trying to decide what to do with them.

But the important qualification is that the details come primarily from Scott's recollection. Contemporary independent documentation establishing the precise number of bouquets, their value or the exact frequency of the deliveries is difficult to establish.

That distinction matters because the story has often been repeated online as though every detail were an undisputed historical fact.

What can be established more firmly is that Trump later publicly expressed admiration for Diana and explicitly wrote that he regretted never having had the opportunity to court her.

"A Dream Lady"

In 1997, Trump published The Art of the Comeback, a book about his business career and his recovery from financial difficulties.

Among its many reflections was a short but revealing passage about Diana.

Trump wrote that his only regret "in the women department" was that he had never had the opportunity to court Lady Diana Spencer. He also described having met her on several occasions and praised the effect she had on people, calling her a "dream lady."

Those words became particularly significant because they appeared in print in the same year Diana died.

The statement does not prove that the flower deliveries happened. Nor does it prove that Diana regarded Trump romantically. But it does establish something important: Trump himself acknowledged that he had wished for an opportunity to court Diana.

That admission is one of the strongest pieces of evidence available concerning his own feelings toward her.

It also helps explain why the story continued to attract attention decades later.

Diana's Side of the Story

The other half of the story is considerably less certain.

Scott claimed that Diana was uncomfortable with Trump's attention. According to Scott, the princess asked her what she should do about the flowers.

Scott recalled Diana asking, in effect, what she was supposed to do, and said that Diana told her Trump gave her "the creeps." Scott's advice was to throw the flowers away, a response that reportedly made Diana laugh.

There is no equally prominent first-person public account from Diana herself confirming this conversation.

That is an important distinction.

Diana died in Paris on August 31, 1997, at the age of 36, after a car crash. The official Royal Family biography records her death and notes the extraordinary public mourning that followed.

Because she never publicly addressed the entire story in detail, later accounts have necessarily depended on people who knew her, journalists who covered her and statements made by Trump himself.

This leaves historians and readers with an unusual situation: Trump's interest is partly documented by his own words, while the claim that Diana felt uncomfortable is primarily based on another person's recollection.

Trump Later Denied Pursuing Her

Years after the story had become part of popular culture, Trump was asked directly about it by broadcaster Piers Morgan.

Trump denied that he had pursued Diana romantically and described the reports as "totally false." He said he thought she was lovely but rejected the suggestion that he had been calling or aggressively pursuing her.

This creates one of the central contradictions in the story.

On one hand, Trump publicly denied the idea that he had pursued Diana.

On the other hand, his own 1997 book contains an explicit statement that he regretted never having had the opportunity to court her.

Those two statements do not necessarily prove that every detail of Scott's story was accurate. Someone can admire or wish to court a person without actually having pursued them in the way described by another observer.

But the contrast explains why the story has remained so fascinating.

There is a difference between saying, "I admired her and wished I had courted her," and saying, "I pursued her and sent her flowers repeatedly."

The first statement came directly from Trump.

The second is primarily attributed to Scott.

The Howard Stern Interviews

Trump's public comments about Diana did not end with his book.

Later in 1997, after Diana's death, Trump appeared on Howard Stern's radio program. During the conversation, Diana's appearance became part of the discussion. Trump described her in highly complimentary terms, and the conversation moved into speculation about whether he could have had a sexual relationship with her. Trump responded that he believed he could have.

The comments attracted attention because they came only weeks after Diana's death.

They also added another layer to the public record. Trump had not merely written about Diana as a famous woman he admired; he had continued speaking publicly about her attractiveness after her death.

Later reports also documented further comments he made about Diana in the years that followed.

These remarks are part of the historical record of how Trump publicly discussed Diana. They do not, however, tell us what Diana privately thought about him.

That remains one of the unanswered elements of the story.

Two Completely Different Worlds

Part of the fascination comes from the contrast between the two personalities.

Diana was born into the British aristocracy and became one of the world's most famous members of the royal family. Her public identity increasingly became associated with humanitarian causes and with her ability to connect with ordinary people.

Trump, meanwhile, had built his identity around New York real estate, luxury developments, branding and celebrity.

Their worlds overlapped at charity dinners, social events and elite gatherings, but their public images were very different.

Diana's fame was inherited through the monarchy but transformed by her personality.

Trump's fame was constructed through business, publicity and television.

Both understood the power of public attention, but they occupied very different positions within it.

That contrast makes the alleged flower campaign particularly memorable. A wealthy New York businessman attempting to attract the attention of a British princess sounds almost like a plot from a romantic comedy.

But for Diana, who spent much of her adult life under intense scrutiny, unwanted attention could have been anything but amusing.

Diana's Life After Divorce

The timing of the alleged flower deliveries is also significant.

After her divorce in 1996, Diana entered a new stage of life. She remained globally famous but was no longer the wife of the future king.

The Royal Family notes that she continued living at Kensington Palace after the divorce and maintained a smaller portfolio of charitable roles. She remained associated with organizations including Centrepoint, the English National Ballet, the Leprosy Mission, the National AIDS Trust, Great Ormond Street Hospital and the Royal Marsden Hospital.

In 1997, her humanitarian work became especially prominent.

She campaigned internationally against land mines and visited Angola, Washington and Bosnia. Her appearance in Angola, where she visited land-mine projects, helped bring international attention to the dangers faced by civilians, particularly children.

By then, Diana was becoming increasingly independent of the traditional royal image.

Her life was moving in a different direction.

The Tragic End

Diana's life ended suddenly on August 31, 1997.

She had been in Paris when the car in which she was traveling crashed in the Pont de l'Alma tunnel. Her companion Dodi Fayed and the driver, Henri Paul, also died. Diana was taken to La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, where she died in the early hours of the morning.

The world reacted with extraordinary grief.

Her funeral at Westminster Abbey on September 6, 1997, became one of the defining public events of the decade. Millions watched around the world, while huge crowds gathered in London.

Diana was only 36.

Her death also meant that any possibility of future clarification about her relationships, friendships and private experiences disappeared with her.

That includes the mystery surrounding Trump.

Whatever actually happened with the flowers, there would never be a later conversation in which Diana could publicly explain her side of the story.

A Princess Remembered

The flower story has survived, but it is only one small episode in the much larger story of Diana's life.

Her legacy became increasingly connected to humanitarian work, public compassion and the causes she championed.

In 2021, Prince William and Prince Harry unveiled a statue of their mother in the Sunken Garden at Kensington Palace. The ceremony took place on July 1, the date that would have been Diana's 60th birthday. The statue had been commissioned by the two brothers in 2017 and was designed by sculptor Ian Rank-Broadley.

The location was significant because the Sunken Garden had been one of Diana's favorite places at Kensington Palace.

The bronze statue depicts Diana surrounded by three children, representing what Kensington Palace described as the universality and generational impact of her work.

William and Harry said they hoped the statue would serve as a symbol of their mother's life and legacy.

That memorial offers a very different image of Diana from the one found in stories about flowers, dating rumors and celebrity fascination.

It focuses not on who wanted to date her, but on what she accomplished and the people she affected.

The Mystery That Remains

So, did Donald Trump really send Princess Diana flowers for weeks?

According to Selina Scott, yes. She described large bouquets of roses and orchids being sent to Kensington Palace and said Diana eventually felt uncomfortable enough to ask what she should do.

Did Diana consider Trump a stalker?

That wording should be treated carefully. Scott said the situation had begun to feel that way to Diana, but there is no publicly available evidence establishing a formal allegation by Diana that Trump was stalking her.

Did Trump want to court Diana?

His own 1997 book provides strong evidence that he wished he had had the opportunity to do so.

Did Diana return his interest?

There is no evidence that she did.

Did Trump later deny pursuing her?

Yes. In a later interview with Piers Morgan, he rejected the reports that he had pursued Diana and called them false.

The result is a story built from several pieces that do not fit perfectly together.

There is Trump's documented admiration.

There is Scott's account of Diana's discomfort.

There is Trump's later denial.

And there is the fact that Diana herself never publicly provided a detailed account confirming or rejecting the entire story.

Beyond the Flowers

More than two decades after Diana's death, the story still circulates because it combines glamour, royalty, wealth and mystery.

Yet the most enduring part of Diana's legacy has little to do with the men who wanted her attention.

She became famous because she was a princess, but she remained famous because of the way she used that platform. Her humanitarian campaigns, her public warmth and her ability to draw attention to difficult subjects helped transform her image from royal celebrity into international humanitarian figure.

Trump's fascination with her is therefore best understood as one episode in the complicated mythology surrounding Diana's extraordinary public life.

The flowers may have arrived.

The bouquets may indeed have accumulated at Kensington Palace.

Scott may have accurately remembered Diana's reaction.

Or some details may have been exaggerated, simplified or remembered differently over time.

What is certain is that Trump later acknowledged wishing he had been able to court Diana, while Diana never became his romantic partner. Their lives crossed briefly within the world of international celebrity, but no relationship developed between them.

Today, the story is remembered less as a failed romance than as one of the many strange footnotes surrounding a woman whose life was lived under an almost unprecedented level of public attention.

At Kensington Palace, the place associated with Diana during the final years of her life, her statue now stands in the Sunken Garden.

It does not commemorate the flowers.

It commemorates Diana herself: a mother, a princess and a humanitarian whose influence continued long after her death.

And perhaps that is the most important part of the story.

Behind all the rumors about who admired Diana, who pursued her and who wanted to court her was a woman whose own work ultimately became far more significant than any romance she might have had.

Diana died young, but the causes she championed and the emotional connection she created with millions of people ensured that her story did not end in Paris in 1997.

It continued in hospitals, charities, humanitarian campaigns, memorials and, eventually, in the garden of Kensington Palace.

The flowers disappeared.

The legend remained.
:::